It seems that the interpertation experience of art work and writing work shows common elements between the two subjects.
Let’s examine how we interpert artwork. Artists usually have an intention or a goal when they produce a piece of artwork. The artist might want to create a feeling of mystery, delight, hope, saddness …….etc. Sometimes the theme of a piece of artwork is so clear that it will initiate a feeling in the heart and the mind of a person that is close to the artist’s intended feelings. We can say that a considerable amount of artwork could be interperted in a different way by different viewers. For a specific piece of artwork, one viewer could feel hope, yet another could feel anxiety. Every human being has grown up in a certain enviroment, gone through unique life experiences and each person will react uniquely to a piece of art work. Consequently, a single piece of artwork will create various feelings for a different people as a result of their diverse backgrounds.
If we try to examine writing interpertation in a way similar to that of a piece of artwork’s interpretation, we will end up with the same or near identical results. Each person with his/her distinctive background and environment will vary in their reaction to a piece of writing such as a novel, a story or an essay. The writer could have a dominant idea, but readers could get a feeling or understanding which is different than that of the writer’s aim. This is because of the phonomena of interpertation.
Although visual arts are considered different from writing, they are similar when it comes to people’s experiences in reacting to the content of both the artwork and writing.
